<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Adams recently announced his financial affiliation with the company Moxxor. Is he letting his subscribers down?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down</link>
	<description>...talking with you</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cave</title>
		<link>http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dainis.info/?p=18#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Despite numerous posting on various blogs about the presence of fillers in Moxxor, not one of the Moxxor leaders has stuck his/her head above the parapet to defend this product.

"Why not" should be the question from those in doubt. I have laid a grave charge against the company and yet "the experts" remain silent. 

Jeremy Harris could easily respond, and yet silence. Equally, either of the Turners could answer my queries, again, silence.
Mike Adams, a self proclaimed Health Ranger and Moxxor guru could answer, more silence.

The question is very simple, why is there  64% of two common (and very cheap)lipids in the mussel oil component of Moxxor. By addition of the filler there is now more Omega 6 in the mussel oil than the combined Omega 3's, and around six times more Omega 9 than the combined Omega 3's.
Consequently there are eight times more Omega 6 and Omega 9 than the valuable Omega 3's. 

Here is the nub of the problem. In our mussel oil extractions Omega 3's OUTNUMBER these two Omegas acids (Oleic and Linoleic) by twenty to one.

What the hell is going on. The Moxxor MLM fraternity should demand a published explanation to the above. I am sure the FTC will be just as interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite numerous posting on various blogs about the presence of fillers in Moxxor, not one of the Moxxor leaders has stuck his/her head above the parapet to defend this product.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why not&#8221; should be the question from those in doubt. I have laid a grave charge against the company and yet &#8220;the experts&#8221; remain silent. </p>
<p>Jeremy Harris could easily respond, and yet silence. Equally, either of the Turners could answer my queries, again, silence.<br />
Mike Adams, a self proclaimed Health Ranger and Moxxor guru could answer, more silence.</p>
<p>The question is very simple, why is there  64% of two common (and very cheap)lipids in the mussel oil component of Moxxor. By addition of the filler there is now more Omega 6 in the mussel oil than the combined Omega 3&#8217;s, and around six times more Omega 9 than the combined Omega 3&#8217;s.<br />
Consequently there are eight times more Omega 6 and Omega 9 than the valuable Omega 3&#8217;s. </p>
<p>Here is the nub of the problem. In our mussel oil extractions Omega 3&#8217;s OUTNUMBER these two Omegas acids (Oleic and Linoleic) by twenty to one.</p>
<p>What the hell is going on. The Moxxor MLM fraternity should demand a published explanation to the above. I am sure the FTC will be just as interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe cave</title>
		<link>http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down/comment-page-1#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe cave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dainis.info/?p=18#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Hi Dainis

I see that the Moxxor leaders have their head in the sand, certainly no response to my comments. In the American system who can you approach if you know that the claims of a company are baseless and in some instances just plain lies. Regardless of our thoughts on the MLM system of marketing there should be a strict protection for those of the MLM fraternity who are led down the garden path by being misinformed on aspects of the product that they may seek to market. Please advise  the revelant authority that I should approach. Its not a contentious issue to resolve, I will just forward extracts of their published information with information that they can use as a standard.

I am still baffled by the presence of 52% oleic acid in the analysis of the GLMO component.  That particular acid is around 1-2% in standard GLMO. Further compounding confusion is the presence of 12.1% Linoleic Acid in their analysis, that is also around 1-2% in the GLMO standard.

Just totalling those two acids and we have around 60% of their expensive GLMO
component that you can get from Olive oil. In fact those two components are the major components of olive oil. You must be able to see why there are grave elements of concern. How do these two acids get there in those ratios unless their is a filler used, something that Moxxor absolutely deny. The science simply does not stack up.

It could well be that the USA Government allows companies to make false claims and if that is the case, then it is a sorry state of affairs.

Joe Cave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dainis</p>
<p>I see that the Moxxor leaders have their head in the sand, certainly no response to my comments. In the American system who can you approach if you know that the claims of a company are baseless and in some instances just plain lies. Regardless of our thoughts on the MLM system of marketing there should be a strict protection for those of the MLM fraternity who are led down the garden path by being misinformed on aspects of the product that they may seek to market. Please advise  the revelant authority that I should approach. Its not a contentious issue to resolve, I will just forward extracts of their published information with information that they can use as a standard.</p>
<p>I am still baffled by the presence of 52% oleic acid in the analysis of the GLMO component.  That particular acid is around 1-2% in standard GLMO. Further compounding confusion is the presence of 12.1% Linoleic Acid in their analysis, that is also around 1-2% in the GLMO standard.</p>
<p>Just totalling those two acids and we have around 60% of their expensive GLMO<br />
component that you can get from Olive oil. In fact those two components are the major components of olive oil. You must be able to see why there are grave elements of concern. How do these two acids get there in those ratios unless their is a filler used, something that Moxxor absolutely deny. The science simply does not stack up.</p>
<p>It could well be that the USA Government allows companies to make false claims and if that is the case, then it is a sorry state of affairs.</p>
<p>Joe Cave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cave</title>
		<link>http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down/comment-page-1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dainis.info/?p=18#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Moxxor is just rubbish and one can only wonder what Mike Adams reasons are for backing this product. He is supposed to be some sort of Guru and had he examined the C of A of the oil he would have very quickly realised how baseless Moxxor's claims are.

It certainly is not the most powerful oil ever, quite the reverse. Save your money and don't get caught up in the hype.

Joe Cave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moxxor is just rubbish and one can only wonder what Mike Adams reasons are for backing this product. He is supposed to be some sort of Guru and had he examined the C of A of the oil he would have very quickly realised how baseless Moxxor&#8217;s claims are.</p>
<p>It certainly is not the most powerful oil ever, quite the reverse. Save your money and don&#8217;t get caught up in the hype.</p>
<p>Joe Cave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dainis W. Michel</title>
		<link>http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down/comment-page-1#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Dainis W. Michel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dainis.info/?p=18#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Hiya Joe Cave,

You are clearly upset about Mike Adams' support of Moxxor, and it seems that you find the product to be sub-par.

What, in your eyes, am I defending?

I differentiate between Moxxor and MLM. 

My thoughts about MLM have nothing to do with Moxxor. A business structure is a business structure. 

Regarding different acids in supplements, I don't really find it relevant to me. I would never touch the Moxxor product, so I have no inclination to investigate it. I am starting to collect wild herbs, I practice urine therapy, I eat superfoods, and like I said before...if it is your passion to investigate these kinds of acids and percentages and their benefits and stuff like that...AWESOME...investigate and let us know. 

But, MLM as such, does not taint the business whatsoever. 

I am currently in the process of configuring an affiliate program for curetinnitus.org, which is a website I founded and run. Does that make it MLM? I guess it does, if people get a referral fee. But how else do I get the word out? How else do I build the business? I'm testing out the concept of referral fees at curetinnitus.org, and I will likely try it for my music eBooks as well. Why not?

If I teach someone how to sight-sing flawlessly because of a $15 eBook I wrote, and I decide to raise the price to $50 at some point and turn it into an online course, and then the person makes a website and sells music and who knows, teaches at a university, well, what is wrong with that person gaining a 35% commission for sales of the eBook and course that basically helped create their whole career and laid a wonderful foundation of musical knowledge for them? 

I only bring up the music eBooks, because referral fees can apply to anything, any business, and if Moxxor were providing a high-quality life-nurturing vegan and vegetarian friendly sustainable product, then if MLM were a part of their business structure, then good for them! 

The point for you, it seems to me, is that Mike really is letting his subscribers down, though the more I think of it, if MLM is NOT a part of a product offering, THEN I find their product more likely to be suspect. 

Think about it. Someone is making product X in out of their home/garage/basement...whatever. How do they grow? If they just want to supply locally and are happy with that, great. But what if they want to distribute their product globally? What business form do you suggest?

It's not like you can just get stuff onto a store shelf. 

So, to summarize, I find that the following are completely separate topics:

1) The quality of a product
2) The business structure of a company (MLM, traditional...)
3) Ethics and Sustainability

So, that means an MLM company can be ethical or not, but being an MLM company does not in any way imply lack of ethics. 

Does that make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Joe Cave,</p>
<p>You are clearly upset about Mike Adams&#8217; support of Moxxor, and it seems that you find the product to be sub-par.</p>
<p>What, in your eyes, am I defending?</p>
<p>I differentiate between Moxxor and MLM. </p>
<p>My thoughts about MLM have nothing to do with Moxxor. A business structure is a business structure. </p>
<p>Regarding different acids in supplements, I don&#8217;t really find it relevant to me. I would never touch the Moxxor product, so I have no inclination to investigate it. I am starting to collect wild herbs, I practice urine therapy, I eat superfoods, and like I said before&#8230;if it is your passion to investigate these kinds of acids and percentages and their benefits and stuff like that&#8230;AWESOME&#8230;investigate and let us know. </p>
<p>But, MLM as such, does not taint the business whatsoever. </p>
<p>I am currently in the process of configuring an affiliate program for curetinnitus.org, which is a website I founded and run. Does that make it MLM? I guess it does, if people get a referral fee. But how else do I get the word out? How else do I build the business? I&#8217;m testing out the concept of referral fees at curetinnitus.org, and I will likely try it for my music eBooks as well. Why not?</p>
<p>If I teach someone how to sight-sing flawlessly because of a $15 eBook I wrote, and I decide to raise the price to $50 at some point and turn it into an online course, and then the person makes a website and sells music and who knows, teaches at a university, well, what is wrong with that person gaining a 35% commission for sales of the eBook and course that basically helped create their whole career and laid a wonderful foundation of musical knowledge for them? </p>
<p>I only bring up the music eBooks, because referral fees can apply to anything, any business, and if Moxxor were providing a high-quality life-nurturing vegan and vegetarian friendly sustainable product, then if MLM were a part of their business structure, then good for them! </p>
<p>The point for you, it seems to me, is that Mike really is letting his subscribers down, though the more I think of it, if MLM is NOT a part of a product offering, THEN I find their product more likely to be suspect. </p>
<p>Think about it. Someone is making product X in out of their home/garage/basement&#8230;whatever. How do they grow? If they just want to supply locally and are happy with that, great. But what if they want to distribute their product globally? What business form do you suggest?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like you can just get stuff onto a store shelf. </p>
<p>So, to summarize, I find that the following are completely separate topics:</p>
<p>1) The quality of a product<br />
2) The business structure of a company (MLM, traditional&#8230;)<br />
3) Ethics and Sustainability</p>
<p>So, that means an MLM company can be ethical or not, but being an MLM company does not in any way imply lack of ethics. </p>
<p>Does that make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Cave</title>
		<link>http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down/comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Cave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dainis.info/?p=18#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Thanks for response admin. However I can't help but feel that you have dropped the ball, you have avoided the real issues and just defended MLM

You have to ask yourself why did Mike Adams jumped aboard this Moxxor bandwagon. This oil has absolutely NO clinical data to back up its outrageous claims, the GLMO mussel oil component has 52% Oleic acid (their figures) and had Mike Adams done his due diligence, as he claimed, that fact alone should have set the alarms bells ringing so loud we would have heard them here in New Zealand. Where the hell is that level of Oleic acid coming from. "Normal" mussel oil has 2% Oleic acid. Interestingly olive oil is around 80% oleic acid and yet Moxxor claims that there are no fillers.

Mike Adams cannot defend the indefensible, and neither should you on his behalf. Just look at the facts, and if you cannot understand DHA and EPA etc find someone who can. They will then ask why has the GLMO component only got 20% of DHA and EPA that would normally have been available, and why have we got 25 times more Oleic acid than we should have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for response admin. However I can&#8217;t help but feel that you have dropped the ball, you have avoided the real issues and just defended MLM</p>
<p>You have to ask yourself why did Mike Adams jumped aboard this Moxxor bandwagon. This oil has absolutely NO clinical data to back up its outrageous claims, the GLMO mussel oil component has 52% Oleic acid (their figures) and had Mike Adams done his due diligence, as he claimed, that fact alone should have set the alarms bells ringing so loud we would have heard them here in New Zealand. Where the hell is that level of Oleic acid coming from. &#8220;Normal&#8221; mussel oil has 2% Oleic acid. Interestingly olive oil is around 80% oleic acid and yet Moxxor claims that there are no fillers.</p>
<p>Mike Adams cannot defend the indefensible, and neither should you on his behalf. Just look at the facts, and if you cannot understand DHA and EPA etc find someone who can. They will then ask why has the GLMO component only got 20% of DHA and EPA that would normally have been available, and why have we got 25 times more Oleic acid than we should have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down/comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dainis.info/?p=18#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Thanks Joe, 

Thanks for sharing. Quantities of this that or the other thing, that is something best handled by others, since I have no expertise with GLMO or DHA, etc. I just don't follow that kind of stuff, though it has its place of course...

My response here is really to what you have to say about MLM. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Why would you ever need MLM if this oil is that good, the answer is obvious.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Umm, MLM, even 2 and 3 tiered structures, may very well be the only way for excellent products to come to a global marketplace. For example, I have a link to David Wolfe's "The Best Day Ever" on this site. While I haven't been a member for a while, I plan on joining the second the site reopens later today. Yes, Mike Adam's seems to be playing some kind of role in the new "The Best Day Ever" site, which has caused me to think twice about re-joining TBDE, but I'll join anyway, and even with Moxxor, Mike Adams has done and continues to do a lot of good work. Where I'm going with this is that it does not in any way weaken David Wolfe's TBDE product that I advertise his site here, and that I would receive a commission, if someone were to make a sale after clicking my link. That, on my end, is not selling out. 

Have I "sold my soul" because I put a David Wolfe affiliate link on this website?

What if David Wolfe's TBDE site has made a significant difference in my life, and what if I want to thank him by advertising for him? And what if someone purchases through my link? That means that someone else that I've been in contact with may wind up receiving the same or more benefit. I mean, there is an interview with someone at TBDE where a woman works with people and improves their eyesight to the point where they don't wear glasses anymore...and she does it through coaching, relaxation, breathing, and other techniques. 

Isn't that wonderful?

...and doesn't MLM power that kind of immediate human benefit? Isn't MLM a driver of innovative products, of heartfelt solutions, of real attempts to provide benefit to humanity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Joe, </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing. Quantities of this that or the other thing, that is something best handled by others, since I have no expertise with GLMO or DHA, etc. I just don&#8217;t follow that kind of stuff, though it has its place of course&#8230;</p>
<p>My response here is really to what you have to say about MLM. </p>
<blockquote><p>Why would you ever need MLM if this oil is that good, the answer is obvious.</p></blockquote>
<p>Umm, MLM, even 2 and 3 tiered structures, may very well be the only way for excellent products to come to a global marketplace. For example, I have a link to David Wolfe&#8217;s &#8220;The Best Day Ever&#8221; on this site. While I haven&#8217;t been a member for a while, I plan on joining the second the site reopens later today. Yes, Mike Adam&#8217;s seems to be playing some kind of role in the new &#8220;The Best Day Ever&#8221; site, which has caused me to think twice about re-joining TBDE, but I&#8217;ll join anyway, and even with Moxxor, Mike Adams has done and continues to do a lot of good work. Where I&#8217;m going with this is that it does not in any way weaken David Wolfe&#8217;s TBDE product that I advertise his site here, and that I would receive a commission, if someone were to make a sale after clicking my link. That, on my end, is not selling out. </p>
<p>Have I &#8220;sold my soul&#8221; because I put a David Wolfe affiliate link on this website?</p>
<p>What if David Wolfe&#8217;s TBDE site has made a significant difference in my life, and what if I want to thank him by advertising for him? And what if someone purchases through my link? That means that someone else that I&#8217;ve been in contact with may wind up receiving the same or more benefit. I mean, there is an interview with someone at TBDE where a woman works with people and improves their eyesight to the point where they don&#8217;t wear glasses anymore&#8230;and she does it through coaching, relaxation, breathing, and other techniques. </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that wonderful?</p>
<p>&#8230;and doesn&#8217;t MLM power that kind of immediate human benefit? Isn&#8217;t MLM a driver of innovative products, of heartfelt solutions, of real attempts to provide benefit to humanity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe cave</title>
		<link>http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down/comment-page-1#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe cave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dainis.info/?p=18#comment-22</guid>
		<description>VJA is right in being a tad suspicious. The so called most potent oil is nothing more than a very weak smattering of Green Lip Mussel Oil, (GLMO) a larger proportion of Hoki Fish oil and an anti oxidant. For the , uninformed here are some indisputable facts.

Moxxor has NO published clinical data for its oil. Instead it has copied the 12 year old results of its competitor, Lyprinol, and, with some creative and very suspect science, has reached some amazing conclusions about the efficacy if its own oil. Also the dose rates of Lyprinol required to achieve the results published would require the consumption of a bottle of pills a day!!! Quackery

When you tease out the constitutients of the GLMO you find that its DHA and EPA components are pathetically weak. There has been many studies done on the types of oil inherent in the GLM. During the summer months the EPA levels are around 24%, the DHA levels are 19%. Compare those figures to Moxxors GLMO.

Mike Adams cannot have been given had any logical and scientific proof on the efficacy of the oil,(there is none) he has seen a marketing opportunity and jumped in "boots and all", he has sold his soul.

Why would you ever need MLM if this oil is that good, the answer is obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VJA is right in being a tad suspicious. The so called most potent oil is nothing more than a very weak smattering of Green Lip Mussel Oil, (GLMO) a larger proportion of Hoki Fish oil and an anti oxidant. For the , uninformed here are some indisputable facts.</p>
<p>Moxxor has NO published clinical data for its oil. Instead it has copied the 12 year old results of its competitor, Lyprinol, and, with some creative and very suspect science, has reached some amazing conclusions about the efficacy if its own oil. Also the dose rates of Lyprinol required to achieve the results published would require the consumption of a bottle of pills a day!!! Quackery</p>
<p>When you tease out the constitutients of the GLMO you find that its DHA and EPA components are pathetically weak. There has been many studies done on the types of oil inherent in the GLM. During the summer months the EPA levels are around 24%, the DHA levels are 19%. Compare those figures to Moxxors GLMO.</p>
<p>Mike Adams cannot have been given had any logical and scientific proof on the efficacy of the oil,(there is none) he has seen a marketing opportunity and jumped in &#8220;boots and all&#8221;, he has sold his soul.</p>
<p>Why would you ever need MLM if this oil is that good, the answer is obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VJA</title>
		<link>http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down/comment-page-1#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>VJA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dainis.info/?p=18#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Hi Dainis,

I found your blog while doing research on Moxxor. Wanted to get your perspective on the product. Looking for unbiased opinions from someone with no MLM agenda. (Which is hard to find)I had read Mike Adams many posts on Moxxor and after looking up info on him, he seemed respected in the industry so I decided to give the product a try, buying from a neighbor. There is so much hype about this product on the internet it is really hard to trust anyone's opinion. Personally, I have been taking 4 to 6 caps a day for 3 weeks and have not noticed any improvement in joint pain, energy or mood. I understand that all bodies are different, Omega 3 is not 100% proven and results will vary. Going to give it a full 60 day trial. Dry eye does seem to be a tad improved. Are there any research web sites or posts where real people are writing real results about this product? I just can't help but feel a tad leery about it. The MLM hype make it feel a little snake oilish to me and I can't help but be skeptical that these expensive little capsules are full of fools gold and I'm the fool for buying into the hype. We all want to use quality, trusted products that contain what they are supposed to. Again the MLM aspect just feels slimy and I can't shake it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dainis,</p>
<p>I found your blog while doing research on Moxxor. Wanted to get your perspective on the product. Looking for unbiased opinions from someone with no MLM agenda. (Which is hard to find)I had read Mike Adams many posts on Moxxor and after looking up info on him, he seemed respected in the industry so I decided to give the product a try, buying from a neighbor. There is so much hype about this product on the internet it is really hard to trust anyone&#8217;s opinion. Personally, I have been taking 4 to 6 caps a day for 3 weeks and have not noticed any improvement in joint pain, energy or mood. I understand that all bodies are different, Omega 3 is not 100% proven and results will vary. Going to give it a full 60 day trial. Dry eye does seem to be a tad improved. Are there any research web sites or posts where real people are writing real results about this product? I just can&#8217;t help but feel a tad leery about it. The MLM hype make it feel a little snake oilish to me and I can&#8217;t help but be skeptical that these expensive little capsules are full of fools gold and I&#8217;m the fool for buying into the hype. We all want to use quality, trusted products that contain what they are supposed to. Again the MLM aspect just feels slimy and I can&#8217;t shake it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down/comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dainis.info/?p=18#comment-20</guid>
		<description>David, just post, man...I'm keeping it chill over here...that's all. Like a nice cool lemonade on a hot day. 

I'm keepin' it warm and fuzzy, like a blanket over your shoulders at a late night camp fire. 

More than happy to host yer post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, just post, man&#8230;I&#8217;m keeping it chill over here&#8230;that&#8217;s all. Like a nice cool lemonade on a hot day. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m keepin&#8217; it warm and fuzzy, like a blanket over your shoulders at a late night camp fire. </p>
<p>More than happy to host yer post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David G Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.dainis.info/articles/mike-adams-recently-announced-his-financial-affiliation-with-the-company-moxxor-is-he-letting-his-subscribers-down/comment-page-1#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>David G Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dainis.info/?p=18#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Hi Dainis,

I was going to comment on your comment here, but my comment is turning into an entire blog post so I'll be posting that on my site when it's ready.

Yes it is easy to criticize Mike Adams from where I'm sitting.. I'll explain fully why I feel the way I do.  I'll explain my own personal reasons for disliking/distrusting Mike Adams.  And I'll respond to the particular points you made here.

If you would like, I'll pull my support of your article from my site... just let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dainis,</p>
<p>I was going to comment on your comment here, but my comment is turning into an entire blog post so I&#8217;ll be posting that on my site when it&#8217;s ready.</p>
<p>Yes it is easy to criticize Mike Adams from where I&#8217;m sitting.. I&#8217;ll explain fully why I feel the way I do.  I&#8217;ll explain my own personal reasons for disliking/distrusting Mike Adams.  And I&#8217;ll respond to the particular points you made here.</p>
<p>If you would like, I&#8217;ll pull my support of your article from my site&#8230; just let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
